House is worse to black folks than Starbucks!

I can forgive Starbucks for dropping the dime on two brothers who wanted to use the bathroom while they were not yet customers.  Starbucks is now flagellating themselves in public, it is all reminiscent of a medieval march with crazy monks and mad monsignors delighting in the lunatic antics.
Starbucks got very little of my money to start and I haven't spent a dime in their in over a year. Not that I have a dime to lose. Not that a dime will buy me anything at all. What's a latte - a fiver?
But I cannot so easily forgive the US House and Senate for what they did to - not 2 brothers, but 2 sisters - Diamond & Silk.
A couple of weeks ago they were in front of the elected officials - some of whom were visibly hostile - as you can see on these videos - and their testimony was under oath.
Not under oath was the white man - Mark Zuckerberg. So if he lied, they are not pressing charges. But they tried every which way to twist the sisters' words so they could draw up charges and scream perjury. You gotta see this *&%&.
Also not under oath was the white woman - Hillary Rodham Clinton, former GOP member now Dem who got off lightly. I guess they don't wanna waste the cuffs on whites, especially rich whites. Save the cuffs for brothers and sisters. Posting while black is now a crime.

Check out the testimony here and see what I mean! No wonder Kanye is backing the Donald.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9Ew2ZE72NE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2U3sj2B8dE


https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/26/diamond-and-silk-congress-hearing-1116887https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/26/diamond-and-silk-congress-hearing-1116887

Diamond and Silk still off of Facebook

The last post was about Diamond and Silk being back on Facebook, alluded to as the 'bathroom wall'. But we were wrong. We took Zuckerberg at his word that things would be fixed, but they were not. And it seems that other black people on Facebook are messed around if they support Trump, Robbi Robinson, for instance, I've seen it with my own eyes. I have no doubt Facebook is being controlled, and when it is in secret, and wastes the time of the people who honestly believe they can post what they want to say within legal limits, there are grounds for law suits.

Here in NYC a black man in a Trump hat was questioned by police, for, well, being a black man in a Trump hat. Turns out someone had reported a black man in Trump hat making an assault at Union Square Station, so the cops are on the lookout. But the man they questioned had an alibi. There are more than one black men in this city wearing Trump hats. And maybe one did commit an assault, maybe this was fake news, so far no leads. How hard is it to catch a black man in Trump hat? My point is, did this really happen at all, or in the way it was reported? And if the assailant was wearing a Trump hat, was he a Trump supporter?
We unequivocally decry any assault, so whoever did this is wrong. But I will continue to wear my Trump hat, no problem with the police if they question me.