Forgot to mention that on the radio show we did yesterday, which you can hear for yourself here -
http://www.radio4all.net/files/tony@cultureshop.org.uk/2149-1-Dialect02Nov2016TX.mp3 -
there was mention of a black officer overhearing Clinton talking dismissively about black soldiers dying
if there was a war. This white witch don't care about no one, and why Shaun King don't wanna wake up and smell the s$%t I don't know. The Dems started the war in the '60s and lots of us got killed.
Liberal white dude Johnson did not care. And neither does Clinton. Wolves in sheeps clothing, fooling tofu eating hippies, get to make another war and get brothers killed. Not that only black soldiers matter, ALL LIVES MATTER.
So tune in whoever you are and DO NOT VOTE FOR CLINTON.
Showing posts with label Vietnam War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vietnam War. Show all posts
Thursday, November 3, 2016
Sunday, March 20, 2016
US military fights for Trump
The New York Daily News seems to be now a single issue paper: Trump. And even good news to them is bad. All news is bad news. Even when it is found out that the military stands for Trump. Bad. Very bad.
Rather, a president who has no respect from the men and women in uniform.
Why? Because they say so, that's why.
It seems to imply that soldiers and sailors are stupid and need to read the liberal press. It even goes so far as to state that soldiers and sailors are FOR torture and killing.
If so, then maybe they need to disband the military.
And we could all live happily ever after using with some liberal agenda of transgender bathrooms; where, for instance, if a middle-aged man suddenly decided he was feeling feminine he could pee right alongside a young girl. Why deny him/her his right to choose?
But it seems a crime for service men and women to exercise their right to choose a commander-in-chief. They might get Clinton as such, and if so, there just might be transgender heads (military slang for bathrooms) for squids (military slang for Navy personnel). And pink camoflage for jarheads (military slang for Marines).
The irony is that it was these transgender loving toilet lovey doveys in the Democrat party that sent 50,000 American soldiers and sailors to die in Vietnam, about what, other than Johnson's friends' construction contracts and tungsten mining, we are not told.
Brothers all over the US are ignoring the hate message of the NYDN and Mayor de Blasio about Trump being a racist. Neither the paper nor the mayor seem willing or able to give anyone a job except for Clinton, whom they would hand a job to along with free rent, like some demented welfare queen trying to use the men's bathroom. And if she tried that, yes, brothers in and out of the service would promptly kick her out.
Rather, a president who has no respect from the men and women in uniform.
Why? Because they say so, that's why.
It seems to imply that soldiers and sailors are stupid and need to read the liberal press. It even goes so far as to state that soldiers and sailors are FOR torture and killing.
If so, then maybe they need to disband the military.
And we could all live happily ever after using with some liberal agenda of transgender bathrooms; where, for instance, if a middle-aged man suddenly decided he was feeling feminine he could pee right alongside a young girl. Why deny him/her his right to choose?
But it seems a crime for service men and women to exercise their right to choose a commander-in-chief. They might get Clinton as such, and if so, there just might be transgender heads (military slang for bathrooms) for squids (military slang for Navy personnel). And pink camoflage for jarheads (military slang for Marines).
The irony is that it was these transgender loving toilet lovey doveys in the Democrat party that sent 50,000 American soldiers and sailors to die in Vietnam, about what, other than Johnson's friends' construction contracts and tungsten mining, we are not told.
Brothers all over the US are ignoring the hate message of the NYDN and Mayor de Blasio about Trump being a racist. Neither the paper nor the mayor seem willing or able to give anyone a job except for Clinton, whom they would hand a job to along with free rent, like some demented welfare queen trying to use the men's bathroom. And if she tried that, yes, brothers in and out of the service would promptly kick her out.
Saturday, March 5, 2016
Ice on Fire: the danger of Democrats in the White House
In an earlier post I noted that Donald Trump is the best candidate as he is not a war candidate, and he specifically has an understanding of Vladimir Putin and Russia. He and Putin meet as men and get along, each with a respect for the other. Concern about reckless Democrats starting more wars is necessary; it was Dems who pulled the stupid Bay of Pigs and then then started the Vietnam War on a lie. People let their guard down with this party of losers and think it is about helping poor people. Poor people want jobs not war and a pat on the back from some idiot savant, as Adlai Stevenson turned out to be, seen as not just an idiot but a liar every time he opened his mouth at the UN trying to deny American involvement in the Bay of Pigs. Democrats also tend to feel intellectually superior to military men, whose lives they do not hesitate to spend. So we need to be a lot more intelligent about whom we elect and not look to the false hopes that Clinton offers. I am 100% that woman WILL take the US to war with Russia and the background reasons for it will be the underground economy some of her people are into, including drugs and human sex slaves. Russia bombed a convoy in Syria that had not only terrorists but DRUGS; ever wonder why the US has been so unsuccessful with ISIS? It is not really trying. This whole thing is a scam like Vietnam and the Democrats are playing like they are for peace. Not that I love the GOP...
One issue here is the press; while they are out making scary headlines, yesterday in the Daily News they used the words 'Code Orange' and put on their front page some nonsense from GOP members telling us that Trump could not be trusted, when in FACT, it is Trump who is NOT for war or nuclear action against Russia - people are NOT informed about the reality of what these supposed love doves in the White House are really doing with your tax $.
Stephen Cohen, author of two or more books on Russia, warns us very specifically in the Nation about a secret military build up by the Obama administration, to which Hillary Clinton is certainly party. On pp. 4-5 of the 29 Feb. 2016 issue he writes:
The Obama administration has just recklessly escalated its military confrontation with Russia. The Pentagon's announcement that it will more than quadruple military spending on the US-NATO forces in countries on or near Russia's borders pushes the new Cold War toward actual war - possibly even a nuclear one.
The move is unprecendented in modern times. With the exception of Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union, Western military power has never been positioned so close to Russia. The Obama administration's decision is Russian roulette Washington-style, making the new Cold War even more dangerous than the preceding one. Russia will certainly react, probably by moving more of its own heavy weapons, including advanced missiles, to its Western borders, possibly along with a number of tactical nuclear weapons. Indeed, a new and more dangerous US-Russian nuclear-arms race has been under way for several years, and the Obama administration's latest decision can only intensify it.
The decision will have other woeful consequences. It will undermine ongoing negotiations between Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the Ukranian and Syrian crises, and it will further divide Europe itself, which is far from united on Washington's increasingly hawkish approach to Moscow.
Astonishingly, these potentially fateful developments have barely been reported in the US media, and there's been no public discussion, not even by the current presidential candidates during their debates. Never before in modern times has such a dire international situation been so ignored in an American presidential campaign. The reason may be that everything related to the new Cold War in US-Russian relations since the Ukrainian crisis erupted in November 2013 has been attributed solely to the "aggression" of Russian president Vladimir Putin or to "Putin's Russia" - a highly questionable assertion, but long the media's standard policy narrative.
Every presidential candidate and the leaders of both parties, as well as the editors and writers in the mainstream media who profess to be covering the 2016 campaign, the state of our nation, and world affairs are morally obliged to bring these dire developments to the fore. Otherwise, they will be harshly judged by history - if anyone is still around to write it.
Again, where is the press? Out covering Romney's stupid tirade against Trump; when they ought to be UNcovering important things like the SECRET MILITARY BUILD UP BY DEMOCRATS.
One issue here is the press; while they are out making scary headlines, yesterday in the Daily News they used the words 'Code Orange' and put on their front page some nonsense from GOP members telling us that Trump could not be trusted, when in FACT, it is Trump who is NOT for war or nuclear action against Russia - people are NOT informed about the reality of what these supposed love doves in the White House are really doing with your tax $.
Stephen Cohen, author of two or more books on Russia, warns us very specifically in the Nation about a secret military build up by the Obama administration, to which Hillary Clinton is certainly party. On pp. 4-5 of the 29 Feb. 2016 issue he writes:
The Obama administration has just recklessly escalated its military confrontation with Russia. The Pentagon's announcement that it will more than quadruple military spending on the US-NATO forces in countries on or near Russia's borders pushes the new Cold War toward actual war - possibly even a nuclear one.
The move is unprecendented in modern times. With the exception of Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union, Western military power has never been positioned so close to Russia. The Obama administration's decision is Russian roulette Washington-style, making the new Cold War even more dangerous than the preceding one. Russia will certainly react, probably by moving more of its own heavy weapons, including advanced missiles, to its Western borders, possibly along with a number of tactical nuclear weapons. Indeed, a new and more dangerous US-Russian nuclear-arms race has been under way for several years, and the Obama administration's latest decision can only intensify it.
The decision will have other woeful consequences. It will undermine ongoing negotiations between Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on the Ukranian and Syrian crises, and it will further divide Europe itself, which is far from united on Washington's increasingly hawkish approach to Moscow.
Astonishingly, these potentially fateful developments have barely been reported in the US media, and there's been no public discussion, not even by the current presidential candidates during their debates. Never before in modern times has such a dire international situation been so ignored in an American presidential campaign. The reason may be that everything related to the new Cold War in US-Russian relations since the Ukrainian crisis erupted in November 2013 has been attributed solely to the "aggression" of Russian president Vladimir Putin or to "Putin's Russia" - a highly questionable assertion, but long the media's standard policy narrative.
Every presidential candidate and the leaders of both parties, as well as the editors and writers in the mainstream media who profess to be covering the 2016 campaign, the state of our nation, and world affairs are morally obliged to bring these dire developments to the fore. Otherwise, they will be harshly judged by history - if anyone is still around to write it.
Again, where is the press? Out covering Romney's stupid tirade against Trump; when they ought to be UNcovering important things like the SECRET MILITARY BUILD UP BY DEMOCRATS.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)