Monday, February 29, 2016

Did Hitler own the New York Times?


On the front page of the New York Times on Saturday there is copious coverage of Trump. One article talks about how the Black Woman will go for Clinton, having gone for Obama in '08 since he was black, though they wanted her too. It FAILS ENTIRELY to mention that there was a BLACK WOMAN running for president then, and in 2012, who had much political experience as a 5 term
Congresswoman - and from Stone Mountain Georgia at that. Where was the NYT when she was offering the voter both a female and an  African American - not the 12% that Obama happens to be, but Mckinney is 100%. Some called her the best man for the job.
Others decided she was and for that very reason gerrymandered her district and the press, complicit in this act against women and blacks, said nothing.
Then again, when Jan Karski went to the press, SPECIFICALLY the NYT in the 1930s to report on the nazis rounding up Jews, the NYT, though owned by a Jew (but then a convert to Christianity), said nothing.
The nazis were, with their silence, able to murder millions of Jews and other peoples. And another American journalist assisted in this genocide: Citizen Kane, aka William Randolph Hearst. He was paid by one of his fellow journalists $400,000 to slander Jews. The payee was once employed by Hearst; and later ended up, like Sulzberger, owning a paper. His name? Adolf Hitler.
The Fourth Estate is up to all kinds of tricks. Not just the NYT, but the NY Daily News was practicing their sleight-of-hand this weekend, with KKK men on the cover, juxtaposed with New Jersey governor  Chris Christie, who is supporting Trump.
So they think maybe that the black voter is a dunce and they put KKK men on the cover with their dunce hoods to hoodwink us into seeing the white racist and associating him with Trump.
Does not work my man. Come clean and lay off the tricks. Print all the news that's fit to print, do not leave out stories about nazi atrocities and do NOT try to play us for fools with the cut and paste imagery on your front pages.
And now about a former presidential candidate, the aforementioned McKinney, she needs to be heard. She was silenced for asking the Bush administration about the missing billions of $ from the Pentagon budget. Where was the NYT on that story? Did they go to the black woman and ask her to vote for the Congresswoman? Not a word my man. The NYT does its sick slick thing and you are in the same boat as the Jews and handicapped in Nazi Germany.
Maybe we need a picture of the publishers with nazi leaders side-by-side, shooting Mckinney and shaking hands with the Bushes.  It would actually be more realistic than any image of Trump and the KKK.

1 comment:

  1. The NY Times is right now doing a hit on Bolivia, worrying about the personal details of the president and gloating that he will not have a 4th term. No articles whatsoever about the good things this guy has done, like kick out exploitive companies that enslaved his people...

    ReplyDelete