La payasa en la palaca

The left is attacking Trump with more force than ever - for one thing, they can avoid discussion about more Clinton pay to play scandals and more emails being dumped in the public domain.
Their best way to defend their candidate is to attack Trump. But they end up looking dumb and more dumber, as when  Ana Navarrro makes a false claim, echoing the story about Trump using an anti-Semitic logo on his revelations about Clinton - she must be dense, Jews are not buying that, his daughter is a Jewish convert, but people, as she claims, have short memories and if the Democrats repeat lies and nonsense it starts to sound like truth in the brains of the less intelligent.

So they fail to turn the Jews against him, and they fail to turn others against him as well, especially with the NYT making false statements from a  woman and being taken to task by her about it. There is a large amount of Hispanics for instance whom the liberal idiot press is ignoring, I even know Mexicans who are for Trump. One of them told me this: No queremos ver nada con la payasa en la palaca - which translated means we don't want a clown in the shack - palaca being a type of Mexican beach hut, often used as a seaside fast food place - but in this case refering to 'La Casa Blanca'.

In Bolivia, there is a man who is supporting Trump and using art to bring to the attention of the world the reality of Iran's unwelcome presence in Bolivia. Even with my bad high school Spanish, I can understand his slogans, and this man is saying more than Clinton and her minions. Here is the link:

http://www.eldeber.com.bo/bolivia/vagabundo-boliviano-apoya-trump.html

Bolivia is going through a rough time, what with the kidnapping, torture and murder of the deputy mining minister. The President, Evo Morales, has called for national mourning, while foreign agitators (like Iran......) are using the situation to fan flames. Yes, they are in the country, but from sources who manages to get close to them in London a few years ago, they would just as soon kill Morales to expedite their grab of the uranium (which has been slowed by the native aversion to digging up the earth). The Clinton State Department (2009-2013) ought to have reached out to Bolivia, where are its left wing credentials if they never bothered to establish diplomatic relations (screwing them up in the first place was Bush's legacy)? Maybe ask Melissa Mark-Viverito who the Bolivian government stays clear of given her pro-terrorism stance here in the US.

Terrorists, Iranians, trouble for Bolivia, trouble for the US. We need a leader who can build bridges, and possibly a few buildings. Assuming that Trump is somehow an anti-Semitic monster out to destroy Latin America because uninformed izqierdistas repeat nonsense is for idiotas.
Do not be surprised if one of the first things that happens with Trump in power is that La Casa Blanca makes peace with La Paz.

http://www.eldeber.com.bo/bolivia/vagabundo-boliviano-apoya-trump.html

Retro

The candidates debated today with the sartorially eloquent Democrat talked tough about Russia and the GOP man seemed a bit angry - and soft on Russia.
Clinton vs. Trump? No my dude, I was having a poetic flashback to the Nixon/Kennedy debates. Funny thing about their stance on Russia and the nuke scare in Cuba - Nixon was advised to change his hawkish stance and go soft; Kennedy's speechwriter tore up his speech and told him to be hard on Russia or face American voters thinking he was too much of a dove.
Kennedy won. Hard on Russia. Then the Bay of Pigs; Dallas; and Vietnam.
Should America have picked Nixon?
Just a bit of a rhetorical question to mark the rhythm here. I am no fan of Nixon. But he did not start the war - it was the Democrat successor to Kennedy - a rogue named Johnson - to whom black lives did not matter. So Vietnam was a good place to get rid of us.
And it might have gone on forever if it had not been for the image of Kim Phuc, her body burned all over with napalm, a little child the victim of the Democrats who started a war to make money.
That's right, dude, these Democrats are slick as a willy, and sick as Clinton - who - I might remind the stupid - voted for the war in Iraq. Remember the Iraqi child, Ali, who was burned all over and endured "mountains of pain"? Maybe not, since the press did NOT put him on front of LIFE magazine as was done with Kim Phuc. Clinton stood with Bush.
Lots of black soldiers now dying in the US from depleted uranium and the Democrats do not lift a finger.
And they will not lift  a finger if we get killed in a war with Russia, Clinton needing to avenge her loss of the Crimea from which drugs and human slaves were being run.
Flashback.

Trump: Third party candidate?

This election is the most controversial in US history. And what I like about it is that it challenges the assumption of the two party system. First of all, Trump and Clinton are NOT the only candidates. Third parties exist but the press is disgusting in their sidelining of these candidates, especially in the case of the very experienced candidate in  2008 and 2012 - an African American whom the press slighted to pan the camera on Obama - who is only fractionally so. Cynthia McKinney was ignored and we got a sly president in who let rich (mostly white) bankers rip off the US, never kept his promise to close Camp X Ray (sent some prisoners secretly to Saudi Arabai, a country not known as a bastion of civil rights, but Obama is like half Arab, so maybe that is why he felt inclined to make that move), and never delivered on the economy.

He also did not take care of Latin American relations, so Iran stole a march on him andnow has its agents all over places in Latin America where lithium 6 and uranium are mined, and can now secretly enrich uranium. Did he ever listen to the likes of USMC Sgt Joe Humire who edited a book on this subject - "Iran's Secret Penetration of Latin America" ? NO.

McKinney knows more about this than Obama and Clinton ever did; but the papers are full of lazy journalists and we get the assumption of a two party system. Part of that assumption is that they are opposed to each other. There is an Indian saying like this: "Would you be surprised if I told you that the left wing and the right wing belonged to the same bird?" Duh is the answer. Major companies sponsor both parties, and behind the scenes, as noted in the book "TRANCE-FORMATION of AMERICA", Clinton and Bush were buddies, the latter happy to have Clinton take over the Oval Office. Major companies like the left a bit better as they are thus in a better position to do things, like, uh, start a war. Vietnam was their baby. Johnson made tons of $. And now Clinton wants Russia.

So we don't need cops to kill brothers, Clinton has the best mass murder scheme in history for this - it's called war. Vietnam killed more brothers than any state trooper with a penchant for the KKK.  The major companies know that they can rely on a left winger to do their job for them. Or for that matter, on GOP members as well.

But they do not trust Trump to start a war; he openly questions the bad intel briefings and DID NOT support the Iraq war as did Clinton. She forgot of course. And so did her fans, who may be in part responsible for killing thousands of black men - and women - and other individuals in uniform unlucky enough to get caught up in another war started by Democrats. Trump is like a third party candidate who beat the press by being a GOP. Maybe he just infiltrated the GOP to get where he is. Bloomberg was GOP, as such he became Mayor of NYC, then he ditched the GOP. So one more reason for me to support Trump. I HATE THE GOP and the assumption of two party only politics.

Trump Cllinton debates

Trump and Clinton will face off in three debates before Election Day.
The first debate is scheduled for Sept. 26, at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, with the other two falling on Oct. 9, in St. Louis, and Oct. 19, in Las Vegas.

We hope that he can bring up the information about her ties to the Bushes and intel outfits that bumped off Ivan Heyn and attempted to bump off Evo Morales - along with taking her to task for the State Department not taking any action to improve relations in South American and therefore allowing Iran to get in and start accessing nuclear material along with secret enrichment facilities.

Clinton's medical report

A medical report from the Mount  Kisco Medical Group in New York leaves no doubt but that Clinton is unfit to reign. Dr Lisa R. Bardack, diagnosing her on 20 March 2015, writes that Hillary Rodham Clinton is complaining about memory loss and mini seizures among other symptoms. Subcortical Vascular Dementia./ Patient it depressed.

This it not what anyone needs at the helm.

Other medical problems include a trip to the doctor for her nose, and what was that about, cocaine?

Trump to help American against Iranian terrorists

Team Clinton is falling apart, what with the news that her emails may have led to the execution of a pro-US spy in Iran, and now the Wikileaks hint that the Seth Rich murder was not a robbery; indeed it wasn't, and why anyone wanted him murdered, other than for political reasons, the police are at a loss to tell. He worked for the DNC at the time of the leaks. Oh the leaks, the leaks, it is raining like mad.
And now this site has leaks! Yes, like how Clinton knew about the Morales assassination attempt in 2009 - who she knew about the Ivan Heyn assassination (for those of you who missed it as there was a press blackout, he was the finance minister of Argentina found dead in the bath at a MercoSur conference in 2011).
And how for many years she foiled attempts to combat Iran's hold on Bolivia and other Latin American countries - where Iran is looking to dig up uranium and lithium 6. And why would they need those elements?
Had it not been for Clinton, who ignored USMC Sgt Joe Humire's warnings over the years - finally published in 2014 as a book titled "Iran's Secret Penetration of Latin America" - we would not be looking at the reality of terrorists getting nuclear material.
But this week former US military and intel have been talking to Trump people about what to do, any private citizen, Trump included, who loves America, has the right to jump in - but better if said private citizen is the president. So many private citizens are working on correcting the problems of the Clinton era at the State Department.
Too man private citizens in fact seem to end up dead because of her, and many could join them if Clinton gets in the White House, what with her allowing Iranian terrorists to work, Chinese spies to work, and her secret military build up against Russia.

Stay tuned. The leaks are starting to get louder and louder, wetter and wetter.

Clinton gets support from sexual predators and meth dealers

Donald Trump does not have the wide base of support that Hillary Clinton does; while he is signing petitions against pornography and child abuse, the most recent put forward by Enough is Enough - Clinton has support from the scum he is trying to protect America from (and she has earned it, she worked hard to get a guilty child abuser set free in Arkansas). Clinton's friend Melissa Mark-Viverito openly and flagrantly campaigns to get terrorists out of jail - including the piece of garbage that killed Americans on the 4th of July here in NYC. Terrorists will vote for Clinton.
And meth dealer Richard Silverthorne will - he, by the way, is not only a fervent supporter of Clinton and her terrorist loving friends, but is a mayor - Fairfax, Virginia. That state wanted to let convicted felons get their voting rights back - and guess who they would vote for!
Then another mayor for Clinton is Bob Filner, long serving Democrat who was a congressman (CA 51st District) before he got in as mayor of San Diego. Now he is either in jail or under house arrest  - for sexual predation, false imprisonment and battery. If he can he will of course vote for some piece of trash who likes criminals like him.
Then there is Kwame Kilpatrick,  former Michigan state representative and Democratic mayor of Detroit. He resigned as mayor after being convicted on felony counts, including perjury and obstruction of justice. Kilpatrick was sentenced to four months in jail after pleading guilty, and was released on probation after serving 99 days. On May 25, 2010, he was sentenced to 18 months to 5 years in state prison for violating his probation,^[4] and served time at the Oaks Correctional Facility in northwest Michigan.


These guys want their voting rights! And they want terrorist out on the street. They do NOT want Trump in the White House. And I think they do NOT want to go to rehab either. No, no no.


So please if you are a decent person out there against sick Clinton supporting criminals get out there and exercise your right to vote and get Trump in.

Clinton kills Moslems then expects thanks

My Moslem friend are annoyed lately at Khizr and Ghazala Khan, the couple who are attacking Donald Trump. These two lost their son in a war that Trump was against; so they are being used by Clinton, who supported the war. It's as if Clinton broke their legs but they gave thanks when they got crutches. And to the further annoyance of many Moslems, Clinton goes against the Koran in her sexual attack - on another woman! Read it in the "Trance-Formation of America." The woman is sick.

But clever; the Democrats are clever as snakes. Let them get caught backstabbing their own, scheming against Bernie Sanders, and they turn the whole thing around by blaming, without any proof whatsoever, another country. Russia. The reds. Commies. Even the heroin addicted mad Senator Joe McCarthy did not blame Russia when US politicians stole each others' info. And Mad Joe did not have a secret military buildup against Russia. The US Democrats do, and Clinton is set to increase it.

And if she starts a stupid war with Russia, following in the footsteps of Napoleon and Hitler, and brothers get killed, we are NOT going to get on their platform letting ourselves be used against their political opponents. Khizr and Ghazala Khan sadly lost their son. They have our condolences in that, but not our respect when it was Clinton who helped kill their son - supporting GOP idiot George Bush or all people. Yes folks, behind the scenes, the money men, warmongering traitors, they pay both right and left so Bush and Clinton take their farthing and do their dirty work.

Who do you think is paying for the Clinton campaign? Hippies wearing hemp? No way. Hippies wearing  hemp are probably too smart to support this environmentally destructive idiot and the party that tried to keep hemp illegal in Kentucky. But sadly, lots of lefties, many of them media types and sick perverts, such as the man she so well defended who was guilty of child abuse - are on her side.

So Moslems are right to take sides with Trump and tell the Khans to stop being patsies for this evil woman who gets their sons killed, abuses other women and defends a child abuser. They wish Trump had been president and there had been no war. The Khans then would have their son and there would be a lot more peace in the world and jobs in the US.

But thanks to the party that started - and profited from - the Vietnam War, the Khans, and many other parents in America and Iraq, lost their children.

Time for a change. Time to vote Trump.