Monday, February 29, 2016
Did Hitler own the New York Times?
On the front page of the New York Times on Saturday there is copious coverage of Trump. One article talks about how the Black Woman will go for Clinton, having gone for Obama in '08 since he was black, though they wanted her too. It FAILS ENTIRELY to mention that there was a BLACK WOMAN running for president then, and in 2012, who had much political experience as a 5 term
Congresswoman - and from Stone Mountain Georgia at that. Where was the NYT when she was offering the voter both a female and an African American - not the 12% that Obama happens to be, but Mckinney is 100%. Some called her the best man for the job.
Others decided she was and for that very reason gerrymandered her district and the press, complicit in this act against women and blacks, said nothing.
Then again, when Jan Karski went to the press, SPECIFICALLY the NYT in the 1930s to report on the nazis rounding up Jews, the NYT, though owned by a Jew (but then a convert to Christianity), said nothing.
The nazis were, with their silence, able to murder millions of Jews and other peoples. And another American journalist assisted in this genocide: Citizen Kane, aka William Randolph Hearst. He was paid by one of his fellow journalists $400,000 to slander Jews. The payee was once employed by Hearst; and later ended up, like Sulzberger, owning a paper. His name? Adolf Hitler.
The Fourth Estate is up to all kinds of tricks. Not just the NYT, but the NY Daily News was practicing their sleight-of-hand this weekend, with KKK men on the cover, juxtaposed with New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who is supporting Trump.
So they think maybe that the black voter is a dunce and they put KKK men on the cover with their dunce hoods to hoodwink us into seeing the white racist and associating him with Trump.
Does not work my man. Come clean and lay off the tricks. Print all the news that's fit to print, do not leave out stories about nazi atrocities and do NOT try to play us for fools with the cut and paste imagery on your front pages.
And now about a former presidential candidate, the aforementioned McKinney, she needs to be heard. She was silenced for asking the Bush administration about the missing billions of $ from the Pentagon budget. Where was the NYT on that story? Did they go to the black woman and ask her to vote for the Congresswoman? Not a word my man. The NYT does its sick slick thing and you are in the same boat as the Jews and handicapped in Nazi Germany.
Maybe we need a picture of the publishers with nazi leaders side-by-side, shooting Mckinney and shaking hands with the Bushes. It would actually be more realistic than any image of Trump and the KKK.
Friday, February 26, 2016
Stats on African American voters/Facts on Clinton
I'm starting to like the Wall Street Journal. Not that I read it every day, but when I do, I find better articles about what is going on behind the scenes, energy prices, China, employment trends, etc. I also find it is more objective and prone to giving facts and statistics rather than opinion.
In the Op section, William A. Gaston gives us lots of stats, rather than opinion, about African American voters, who, not surprisingly, after an endorsement from South Carolina Congressman
James Clyburn, the highest ranking brother in the House, picked Hillary Clinton in the SC caucus.
In the south, the black vote can be just over 50%. So Sanders' failure to capture it was crucial.
In the GOP of course the black vote is a lot less. 13% in the Nevada caucus. So it could take a swing vote of black voters who are registered Democrat to put Donald Trump in power - but as we get to know Trump and Clinton a lot better, I think that is way possible.
Clinton is a weak leader riding on the wave of her husband, making sloppy mistakes like sending classified information on hotmail addresses, Bengazi, messing up the Balkans, etc. And she ended up being noted as a lesbian rapist with serious sick tendencies to use sex slaves in a book titled The Trance-Formation of America by Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brien. The latter was being used by the Bushes for such acts, along with her young daughter, and the CIA tried to kill Phillips, a former DIA agent who had worked in Lebanon on top secret assignments, which is how he found out about the Bush/Cheney child abuse scandals.
When he prepared his report, originally for Congress, it was shot down so he published it privately.
The surprise in his book was that not only were Republicans into this stuff (but not Trump or anyone even remotely associated with him) - but also Democrats, so both sides turned against them. They have written a second book since with more dirt, backed up with evidence, on this stuff.
Black voters statistically turn against sex offenders. The white establishment is known to turn a blind eye to this, which can be seen in their book - this kind of stuff was rampant in Washington and we may have more of it if we get Hillary in. So I hope to expose more of her weird, criminal acts and spare the country, and the military, from a stupid and demented commander-in-chief.
And one final thought, you might want to google around about how China got US military secrest during the Clinton years. Do some homework dude, get a copy of the Trance-Formation of America, and you will have things even the WSJ does not have the guts to print.
And you'll understand why we need Trump in Washington.
In the Op section, William A. Gaston gives us lots of stats, rather than opinion, about African American voters, who, not surprisingly, after an endorsement from South Carolina Congressman
James Clyburn, the highest ranking brother in the House, picked Hillary Clinton in the SC caucus.
In the south, the black vote can be just over 50%. So Sanders' failure to capture it was crucial.
In the GOP of course the black vote is a lot less. 13% in the Nevada caucus. So it could take a swing vote of black voters who are registered Democrat to put Donald Trump in power - but as we get to know Trump and Clinton a lot better, I think that is way possible.
Clinton is a weak leader riding on the wave of her husband, making sloppy mistakes like sending classified information on hotmail addresses, Bengazi, messing up the Balkans, etc. And she ended up being noted as a lesbian rapist with serious sick tendencies to use sex slaves in a book titled The Trance-Formation of America by Mark Phillips and Cathy O'Brien. The latter was being used by the Bushes for such acts, along with her young daughter, and the CIA tried to kill Phillips, a former DIA agent who had worked in Lebanon on top secret assignments, which is how he found out about the Bush/Cheney child abuse scandals.
When he prepared his report, originally for Congress, it was shot down so he published it privately.
The surprise in his book was that not only were Republicans into this stuff (but not Trump or anyone even remotely associated with him) - but also Democrats, so both sides turned against them. They have written a second book since with more dirt, backed up with evidence, on this stuff.
Black voters statistically turn against sex offenders. The white establishment is known to turn a blind eye to this, which can be seen in their book - this kind of stuff was rampant in Washington and we may have more of it if we get Hillary in. So I hope to expose more of her weird, criminal acts and spare the country, and the military, from a stupid and demented commander-in-chief.
And one final thought, you might want to google around about how China got US military secrest during the Clinton years. Do some homework dude, get a copy of the Trance-Formation of America, and you will have things even the WSJ does not have the guts to print.
And you'll understand why we need Trump in Washington.
Trump bashers secret agenda
There are a few nasty entities in the GOP camp that are trying desperately to dissuade voters from Donald Trump. Our Principles PAC, for instance, whose executive director, Katie Packer, is warning voters to act before they 'run out of runway' - is on the road, or runway, chasing down voters.
What she may not tell you in her hot pursuit is just WHY; that part is put to light by Patrick O'Connor in the Wall Street Journal (24 Feb., p.4) when he notes: "The catch: many of those detractors represent the very entrenched political interests Mr. Trump is running against."
Our Principles PAC already spent $3.5 million trying to derail him. Club for Growth, another wolf in sheep's clothing, is spending $1 million for Super Tuesday.
Where is the money coming from? As mentioned before on the blog, Trump does not spend money even on ads. His support is real, from peoplel who want jobs and a peace time economy with a leader who is NOT stupid (could I be refering to Hillary?) or in with the MIC.
On Hillary, more to come. Stay tuned. People do NOT know what she is really all about.
And if it gets to be a race between Trump and Clinton, she too may be secretly funding orgs to derail his campaign. This is no tea party. The race for the White House has always been down and dirty and expect it to get worse.
What she may not tell you in her hot pursuit is just WHY; that part is put to light by Patrick O'Connor in the Wall Street Journal (24 Feb., p.4) when he notes: "The catch: many of those detractors represent the very entrenched political interests Mr. Trump is running against."
Our Principles PAC already spent $3.5 million trying to derail him. Club for Growth, another wolf in sheep's clothing, is spending $1 million for Super Tuesday.
Where is the money coming from? As mentioned before on the blog, Trump does not spend money even on ads. His support is real, from peoplel who want jobs and a peace time economy with a leader who is NOT stupid (could I be refering to Hillary?) or in with the MIC.
On Hillary, more to come. Stay tuned. People do NOT know what she is really all about.
And if it gets to be a race between Trump and Clinton, she too may be secretly funding orgs to derail his campaign. This is no tea party. The race for the White House has always been down and dirty and expect it to get worse.
Super Tuesday around the corner
Donald Trump is clearly in the lead to be GOP candidate. But there are 11 states to go, with Super Tuesday just around the corner. So journalists and pollsters are busy, everyone trying to get the crystal ball as clear as possible.
Trump's wins are a surprise to many. Jeb Bush saw the signs, cut his losses and pulled out. It's up to Ted Cruz of Texas and Marc Rubio to hope that they can change the tide. Now that Cruz's underhanded campaign tactics have come to light, it may only be up to Rubio. Both are from states with lots of voting power.
But the voters even in their states seem to like Trump better. In a front page Wall Street Journal article from Wednesday (24 Feb.), Janet Hook and Arian Campo-Flores interview the Republican voters in the south, and typical quotes were:
"I want somebody that can win. His success in business is unparalleled. He can run the country" - Jeannie Svenson, a retiree and evangelical Christian from Alabama.
"I'm not looking for a preacher. I;m looking for a man who leads" - Bonnie Shanahan, also a retiree and and Christian from the same state.
Not only does the article give us these quotes, but that country/rock singer Donica Knight is planning to wite a song about Trump and gift it to the campaign.
So we'll see, and thanks to the WSJ for its balanced reporting. I take umbrage at the New York Times and other papers that try to undermine a campaign, four years ago for instance many were bashing the Ron Paul campaign and failing to report its wins in the caucuses. The NYT is especially slanted even towards left wing governments, constatly failing to mention the advances that Evo Morales has made in Bolivia, but then reporting on a daily basis the votes a fourth term.
Expect major papers in the US to be slanted, if for no other reason, other candidates are spending money on ads, while Trump openly admits he is getting so much free publicity he does not need to buy the press. Way to go!
Trump's wins are a surprise to many. Jeb Bush saw the signs, cut his losses and pulled out. It's up to Ted Cruz of Texas and Marc Rubio to hope that they can change the tide. Now that Cruz's underhanded campaign tactics have come to light, it may only be up to Rubio. Both are from states with lots of voting power.
But the voters even in their states seem to like Trump better. In a front page Wall Street Journal article from Wednesday (24 Feb.), Janet Hook and Arian Campo-Flores interview the Republican voters in the south, and typical quotes were:
"I want somebody that can win. His success in business is unparalleled. He can run the country" - Jeannie Svenson, a retiree and evangelical Christian from Alabama.
"I'm not looking for a preacher. I;m looking for a man who leads" - Bonnie Shanahan, also a retiree and and Christian from the same state.
Not only does the article give us these quotes, but that country/rock singer Donica Knight is planning to wite a song about Trump and gift it to the campaign.
So we'll see, and thanks to the WSJ for its balanced reporting. I take umbrage at the New York Times and other papers that try to undermine a campaign, four years ago for instance many were bashing the Ron Paul campaign and failing to report its wins in the caucuses. The NYT is especially slanted even towards left wing governments, constatly failing to mention the advances that Evo Morales has made in Bolivia, but then reporting on a daily basis the votes a fourth term.
Expect major papers in the US to be slanted, if for no other reason, other candidates are spending money on ads, while Trump openly admits he is getting so much free publicity he does not need to buy the press. Way to go!
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Trump is the most popular GOP presidential candidate ever
On CNN’s State of the Union Anchor
Jake Tapper asked Trump about the GOP's ability to attract
non-white votes. Trump replied the
election will be “between Hillary and myself,” and predicted that he
will “do great with African Americans” because of his promise to create
jobs.
A recent poll (SurveyUSA Poll) came out where he had 25% African American; Republicans usually get about 4% or 5%. One of the hosts said, if he ever gets 25%, this election’s over. You might as well not run it. Other polls show a similar trend, making him the most popular ever GOP candidate:
Fox News, Feb. 15-17: Trump’s support among blacks was 10%.
USA Today/Suffolk, Feb. 11-15: Trump got 7%.
Quinnipiac University, Feb. 10-15: This poll showed Trump’s level of support at 12%
Morning Consult, Feb. 3-7: Trump received 11%.
Quinnipiac University, Feb. 2-4: Trump received 10%
This is the most popular GOP candidate since Lincoln! For whom only free rich white men could vote...
A recent poll (SurveyUSA Poll) came out where he had 25% African American; Republicans usually get about 4% or 5%. One of the hosts said, if he ever gets 25%, this election’s over. You might as well not run it. Other polls show a similar trend, making him the most popular ever GOP candidate:
USA Today/Suffolk, Feb. 11-15: Trump got 7%.
Quinnipiac University, Feb. 10-15: This poll showed Trump’s level of support at 12%
Morning Consult, Feb. 3-7: Trump received 11%.
Quinnipiac University, Feb. 2-4: Trump received 10%
This is the most popular GOP candidate since Lincoln! For whom only free rich white men could vote...
Batting 1000! 3 wins in a row!
Well folks despite the pessimism rained down on Mr Trump from so many churnalists in the land, he now has three wins in a row – New Hampshire, South Carolina, and now Nevada!
Over the next two days, the Trump campaign will be in Virginia Beach,
VA at Regent University for a Presidential Candidate Forum and
participating in the CNN GOP Debate in Houston Texas. Over the weekend, it will be traveling to Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Alabama.
We are only one week away from Super Tuesday and early voting has begun in Texas and Georgia - find your polling location at DonaldJTrump.com/vote
Tuesday, February 23, 2016
Trump on Gun Control/The America We Deserve
While I support Donald Trump's bid for president, I am not in the GOP, and I am far from being a GOP type of person. One issue with the GOP is gun control, since their interpretation of the 2nd Amendment seems that every crazy criminal has a right to acquire an arsenal and shoot as many people as they can, every freaking weekend in this country. High schools, post offices, shopping malls, churches; the NRA is coming soon to one of these near you, blasting your face with some arguments about a well ordered militia.
A well ordered militia is one thing; I know, I was in such; it's called the US Army. We had to prove ourselves psychologically before being issued even a handgun, and much was required before any long guns, let along a machine gun, was allowed to pass into our hands. And that was after going through Boot Camp, inspections, evaluations, criminal background checks, etc.
On the other hand the right to a weapon, possibly useful as a deterrent and as a tool to defend one's family, ought to be in place. Taking a look at Trump's words, we find, on page 102 of his 2000 book "The America We Deserve" his support for a ban on assault weapons and a longer waiting period to buy a gun. He notes that in today's tech society a background check can be made quickly and why not?
His interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is so much more sane than most in the GOP. And his interpretation could have saved lots of American lives. Just this week we are reeling from the Uber shooter. Six people dead. Families devastated. Guns killed. Just ask the police in Michigan. And those in every other state of the Union - including Texas where the police were against George Bush for his support of the Bushmaster blasters that killed a cop.
And since guns do kill - they are in fact made to do just that - they do not belong in the hands of crazy crack/meth/croc heads, punks, terrorists, white supremacists, etc etc etc.
The 'well ordered militia' does NOT include the crazy weirdo across the street who mutters to himself and has fantasies about slashing faces. My dude, it means the five branches of the US military: the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard, along with the local police, FBI, etc.,
and it can mean RESPONSIBLE private citizens who have their permits renewed based on their conduct in society. Like maybe they actually know how to use the gun and do not leave it around for their kids to play with. Or freebase, watch sick violent mutilation videos or hear voices in their heads.
I hope the GOP is reading this, from a former serviceman, and taking note. Elect Trump and let him implement his BAN ON ASSAULT weapons and longer period of waiting for a background check. Let each applicant prove that they are part of a well ordered militia and NOT a stinking crazy looking to get famous in 15 minutes at the local high school. American have had enough, every community black, white or other has been affected by this irresponsible interpretation of the Constitution.
A well ordered militia is one thing; I know, I was in such; it's called the US Army. We had to prove ourselves psychologically before being issued even a handgun, and much was required before any long guns, let along a machine gun, was allowed to pass into our hands. And that was after going through Boot Camp, inspections, evaluations, criminal background checks, etc.
On the other hand the right to a weapon, possibly useful as a deterrent and as a tool to defend one's family, ought to be in place. Taking a look at Trump's words, we find, on page 102 of his 2000 book "The America We Deserve" his support for a ban on assault weapons and a longer waiting period to buy a gun. He notes that in today's tech society a background check can be made quickly and why not?
His interpretation of the 2nd Amendment is so much more sane than most in the GOP. And his interpretation could have saved lots of American lives. Just this week we are reeling from the Uber shooter. Six people dead. Families devastated. Guns killed. Just ask the police in Michigan. And those in every other state of the Union - including Texas where the police were against George Bush for his support of the Bushmaster blasters that killed a cop.
And since guns do kill - they are in fact made to do just that - they do not belong in the hands of crazy crack/meth/croc heads, punks, terrorists, white supremacists, etc etc etc.
The 'well ordered militia' does NOT include the crazy weirdo across the street who mutters to himself and has fantasies about slashing faces. My dude, it means the five branches of the US military: the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines and Coast Guard, along with the local police, FBI, etc.,
and it can mean RESPONSIBLE private citizens who have their permits renewed based on their conduct in society. Like maybe they actually know how to use the gun and do not leave it around for their kids to play with. Or freebase, watch sick violent mutilation videos or hear voices in their heads.
I hope the GOP is reading this, from a former serviceman, and taking note. Elect Trump and let him implement his BAN ON ASSAULT weapons and longer period of waiting for a background check. Let each applicant prove that they are part of a well ordered militia and NOT a stinking crazy looking to get famous in 15 minutes at the local high school. American have had enough, every community black, white or other has been affected by this irresponsible interpretation of the Constitution.
Monday, February 22, 2016
Trump vs. Carson
Last week we started this blog and somehow it got deleted on blogger; so we had to get it back online. Let's hope it stays.
Donald Trump won South Carolina in the meantime, so two pieces of good news. Nevada is next.
This weekend we got lots of friends checking out the blog and thinking hard about Trump. Most agree that
he is the BEST choice for president, a warless economy is what they are expecting and while there are other candidate right and left who do have many good qualities, this blog is not about bashing the competition at all, they just do not have the experience that Donald J. Trump possesses with his lifetime of real business projects.
Now many brothers ask about Ben Carson. Great guy. Wonderful and skilled human being in whose hands people entrust their lives. But would you really take you life savings to a surgeon to invest, or would you rather have an experiences fund manager? I think the point is made.
Carson belongs in the medical field, at the very top of it, and he is WAY ahead of other most other candidates in his professional skill level and service to society. The Trump administration ought to avail itself of his knowledge for the nation's benefit.
But anyone with military experience knows that the chief medical officer on a ship does not make the best captain. The captain may not possess the hands as skilled with a scalpel or the vast scientific knowledge that the doctor has; but he does have the experience on the bridge and as a manager of people.
I guess I'm going over the same point, but only to say that I really respect Dr Carson a lot, I'd rather have him than any other if I were in need of a surgeon, but as president of this country I have to pick Trump.
And I hope that the American voters, whatever their race may be, will agree, respecting both Trump and Dr Carson, but each in their appropriate way.
Donald Trump won South Carolina in the meantime, so two pieces of good news. Nevada is next.
This weekend we got lots of friends checking out the blog and thinking hard about Trump. Most agree that
he is the BEST choice for president, a warless economy is what they are expecting and while there are other candidate right and left who do have many good qualities, this blog is not about bashing the competition at all, they just do not have the experience that Donald J. Trump possesses with his lifetime of real business projects.
Now many brothers ask about Ben Carson. Great guy. Wonderful and skilled human being in whose hands people entrust their lives. But would you really take you life savings to a surgeon to invest, or would you rather have an experiences fund manager? I think the point is made.
Carson belongs in the medical field, at the very top of it, and he is WAY ahead of other most other candidates in his professional skill level and service to society. The Trump administration ought to avail itself of his knowledge for the nation's benefit.
But anyone with military experience knows that the chief medical officer on a ship does not make the best captain. The captain may not possess the hands as skilled with a scalpel or the vast scientific knowledge that the doctor has; but he does have the experience on the bridge and as a manager of people.
I guess I'm going over the same point, but only to say that I really respect Dr Carson a lot, I'd rather have him than any other if I were in need of a surgeon, but as president of this country I have to pick Trump.
And I hope that the American voters, whatever their race may be, will agree, respecting both Trump and Dr Carson, but each in their appropriate way.
Friday, February 19, 2016
Are you reading this?
There is a reason for the inane sounding title. But here is the reason.
This blog was started yesterday.
When we checked it this morning, it was deleted.
So I went to blogger, and blogger does not list it as deleted.
Two different computer systems gave us the page that this
blog was deleted. It does not come up when we put in the URL -
www.brothers4trump.blogspot.com
So we are wondering what gives.
Could be a simple hitch, could be that someone is pulling strings
as they don't like African Americans or they don't like Donald Trump or both.
So feedback is well appreciated. Help us protect freedom of speech.
The Donald and African Americans do agree on this tenet of the Constitution, let's hope blogger and the powers that be are not against it.
If you are reading this, then please scroll down to our first post which we hope is not deleted.
This blog was started yesterday.
When we checked it this morning, it was deleted.
So I went to blogger, and blogger does not list it as deleted.
Two different computer systems gave us the page that this
blog was deleted. It does not come up when we put in the URL -
www.brothers4trump.blogspot.com
So we are wondering what gives.
Could be a simple hitch, could be that someone is pulling strings
as they don't like African Americans or they don't like Donald Trump or both.
So feedback is well appreciated. Help us protect freedom of speech.
The Donald and African Americans do agree on this tenet of the Constitution, let's hope blogger and the powers that be are not against it.
If you are reading this, then please scroll down to our first post which we hope is not deleted.
Thursday, February 18, 2016
Why Trump is the best choice for President
Donald Trump is without a doubt a contentious candidate. He is associated with the Anglo-Saxon American, (actually he is not, he is Celt/German) he has appeal to more
than just his brothers of European descent.
Fact is he hires people of all races, and has lots of support from the people he hires. Which right away is more than can be said of any of the idealistic candidates running for the White House at the moment.
Far from perfect; but I think I have already made the case for him. NO OTHER candidate has any real
experience putting people to work, and no one wants to have some idealist giving you pep talks about politics while at you are out looking for a job that does not exist.
OK. First point made.
Second point.
Lots of candidates are on the side of WAR, and yes that includes the left, which is responsible for more
wars than the GOP. Vietnam? That was the Dems. WWII? Dems.
Obama promised to make peace and close Camp X-Ray? Never did. Bankers own this dude.
Real business people, who create housing for instance, are averse to war. Politicians who lack business experience need war, and are prone to suggestion. Right now, the US has been dragged into a retro McCarthy stance on Russia just because the Russian speakers in the Crimea, which was Russian for centuries, exercised some democracy and with a vote of 99% decided to be back with Russia. So what. Let it be my man.
But no, this was a base of drug dealing etc. and so certain people got together and decided to make financial
war with Russia. Then the fiasco in Syria. Russia did what the politicians here are NOT doing, they bombed those creepy crawly people called ISIS. And in so doing, they bombed a convoy of drugs from from the Turkish crime syndicate, so Turkey shot down a Russian plane.
The politicians in this country are using Syria to get contracts and NOT going after ISIS. Criminal elements are going after Russia and using US tax $ to attack Putin. Tax $ that belong here my man. Not in Syria. Let Syria deal with Syria, and if the Russians bomb ISIS, job well done. Int'l bankers want US tax $ to rebuild Syria, it's the plan Stan.
Trump understands this. And he understands Putin. So he will NOT start another war and get brothers and sisters in the US military, in which I did 2 tours (Saudi Arabia, demolitions expert) killed for the $ guys.
Flashback to USMC General Smedley Butler; look it up on google, check it out, you need to know. And then read President/US Army General Eisenhower's remarks about the MIC. Read my brothers.
Then think - then vote.
Let's get a guy in there who talks sense because he hires people and does NOT have his $ in the MIC.
And let's have 8 years working on the ECONOMY, leaving Russia and Syria alone. Man, we got millions of people here who want jobs and no WAR. So OK, I hear most of you, Trump is not your main man. He does some things we all do not approve of, he makes his mistakes, but he does not go and start no war.
If you got a better candidate, I am all ears so let me hear, but you better have someone with BUSINESS EXPERIENCE and an understanding or other countries and real issues like immigrants taking jobs.
By the way, I'll be out in the streets here in New York to let people know, especially the GOP, that we want jobs. Bush and Cruz are NOT about that so I hope they are reading this and considering that if they want any of the vote from us, don't even think about those two losers. Get in Trump and you have our support which you need more than you know.
than just his brothers of European descent.
Fact is he hires people of all races, and has lots of support from the people he hires. Which right away is more than can be said of any of the idealistic candidates running for the White House at the moment.
Far from perfect; but I think I have already made the case for him. NO OTHER candidate has any real
experience putting people to work, and no one wants to have some idealist giving you pep talks about politics while at you are out looking for a job that does not exist.
OK. First point made.
Second point.
Lots of candidates are on the side of WAR, and yes that includes the left, which is responsible for more
wars than the GOP. Vietnam? That was the Dems. WWII? Dems.
Obama promised to make peace and close Camp X-Ray? Never did. Bankers own this dude.
Real business people, who create housing for instance, are averse to war. Politicians who lack business experience need war, and are prone to suggestion. Right now, the US has been dragged into a retro McCarthy stance on Russia just because the Russian speakers in the Crimea, which was Russian for centuries, exercised some democracy and with a vote of 99% decided to be back with Russia. So what. Let it be my man.
But no, this was a base of drug dealing etc. and so certain people got together and decided to make financial
war with Russia. Then the fiasco in Syria. Russia did what the politicians here are NOT doing, they bombed those creepy crawly people called ISIS. And in so doing, they bombed a convoy of drugs from from the Turkish crime syndicate, so Turkey shot down a Russian plane.
The politicians in this country are using Syria to get contracts and NOT going after ISIS. Criminal elements are going after Russia and using US tax $ to attack Putin. Tax $ that belong here my man. Not in Syria. Let Syria deal with Syria, and if the Russians bomb ISIS, job well done. Int'l bankers want US tax $ to rebuild Syria, it's the plan Stan.
Trump understands this. And he understands Putin. So he will NOT start another war and get brothers and sisters in the US military, in which I did 2 tours (Saudi Arabia, demolitions expert) killed for the $ guys.
Flashback to USMC General Smedley Butler; look it up on google, check it out, you need to know. And then read President/US Army General Eisenhower's remarks about the MIC. Read my brothers.
Then think - then vote.
Let's get a guy in there who talks sense because he hires people and does NOT have his $ in the MIC.
And let's have 8 years working on the ECONOMY, leaving Russia and Syria alone. Man, we got millions of people here who want jobs and no WAR. So OK, I hear most of you, Trump is not your main man. He does some things we all do not approve of, he makes his mistakes, but he does not go and start no war.
If you got a better candidate, I am all ears so let me hear, but you better have someone with BUSINESS EXPERIENCE and an understanding or other countries and real issues like immigrants taking jobs.
By the way, I'll be out in the streets here in New York to let people know, especially the GOP, that we want jobs. Bush and Cruz are NOT about that so I hope they are reading this and considering that if they want any of the vote from us, don't even think about those two losers. Get in Trump and you have our support which you need more than you know.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)