Retro

The candidates debated today with the sartorially eloquent Democrat talked tough about Russia and the GOP man seemed a bit angry - and soft on Russia.
Clinton vs. Trump? No my dude, I was having a poetic flashback to the Nixon/Kennedy debates. Funny thing about their stance on Russia and the nuke scare in Cuba - Nixon was advised to change his hawkish stance and go soft; Kennedy's speechwriter tore up his speech and told him to be hard on Russia or face American voters thinking he was too much of a dove.
Kennedy won. Hard on Russia. Then the Bay of Pigs; Dallas; and Vietnam.
Should America have picked Nixon?
Just a bit of a rhetorical question to mark the rhythm here. I am no fan of Nixon. But he did not start the war - it was the Democrat successor to Kennedy - a rogue named Johnson - to whom black lives did not matter. So Vietnam was a good place to get rid of us.
And it might have gone on forever if it had not been for the image of Kim Phuc, her body burned all over with napalm, a little child the victim of the Democrats who started a war to make money.
That's right, dude, these Democrats are slick as a willy, and sick as Clinton - who - I might remind the stupid - voted for the war in Iraq. Remember the Iraqi child, Ali, who was burned all over and endured "mountains of pain"? Maybe not, since the press did NOT put him on front of LIFE magazine as was done with Kim Phuc. Clinton stood with Bush.
Lots of black soldiers now dying in the US from depleted uranium and the Democrats do not lift a finger.
And they will not lift  a finger if we get killed in a war with Russia, Clinton needing to avenge her loss of the Crimea from which drugs and human slaves were being run.
Flashback.